I do not see why Shakespeare was in the curriculum of my English course's in year 10 and 12. It is not relevant language today, and it should be taught in History classes, not English.
Quote from: BFM_DarkFyr on April 29, 2011, 06:27:40 PMI do not see why Shakespeare was in the curriculum of my English course's in year 10 and 12. It is not relevant language today, and it should be taught in History classes, not English.Er...I strongly disagree. Shakespeare is literature. Just like Jane Austen, Charles Dickens, JRR Tolkien, Emily Bronte, etc. Where else should literature be taught but in an English class?
Quote from: BFM_SWiFT on April 25, 2011, 07:19:35 AMTo be honest I quite like his work. In highschool I did:...- Richard II (or III, I can't remember) Richard the Third - shows how much you were paying attention!
To be honest I quite like his work. In highschool I did:...- Richard II (or III, I can't remember) Richard the Third - shows how much you were paying attention!