Alright, if any of you want to research by all means. I am doing the appealant factum for the R. v. Hufsky case. We have a RIDE program in ontario (Reduce Impaired Driving Everywhere). They set up random check spots where they stop EVERY car and if they see a u-turn, they chase. Now, Hufsky rolled up to the RIDE impaired, was given a breatlyzer and failed the breathlyzer. Anywho, he took it to the supreme court arguing that under s.8 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom states that no one should be subject to unreasonable search or seizure. He claimed that the RIDE program was against his rights because they had no reasonable cause to stop him. However, the judges agreed with Hufsky saying that the stops did infringe on his rights, however under s.1 of the Charter any judge can overrule and claim that the rights infringment was in the best interest of society. The judged did this and said that this program does save lives. Hufsky lost and was charged with D.U.I. I'm not going to provide a link but if anyone wants to help me out all you have to do is search R. v. Hufsky on google.
Thanks guys,
ReF